Lt. Gary Megge of the State Police Traffic Services Section spoke with Lansing State Journal columnist John Schneider and objected to that interpretation. Lt. Megge says that it wouldn't matter if there were damage or not. If you slide off the road, you have ipso facto "failed to adjust to existing conditions," an offense under the traffic code.
I can understand Lt. Megge's point, but where does the line get drawn? You were driving too fast for the existing condition of a pothole that exploded your tire? You were driving too fast for the existing condition of a tornado? Maybe because of it? What if you've failed to adjust to existing conditions but are lucky and don't slide into a ditch? Still guilty? Is claiming you slid into the ditch on purpose a defense?
Seems like a law in need of semantic assistance. Lt. Megge, unfortunately, supplies some:
Too many drivers believe government is obligated to allow them to get from Point A to Point B under any conditions. That's just not the case.Maybe too many State Police Traffic Services Section public employees believe that what the government "allows" is even at issue. Government, rather, is manifestly not obligated to rescue me from my stupidity should I travel unwisely. If they were, we could sue for failure to protect from sliding into the ditch, or for bodily harm incurred in gun-free zones.