Friday, July 30, 2010

More Electric Vehicle news

When you've lost the New York Times, well you've lost an elitist institution most of whose members wouldn't have bought a Volt in any event.
So the future of General Motors (and the $50 billion taxpayer investment in it) now depends on a vehicle that costs $41,000 but offers the performance and interior space of a $15,000 economy car. The company is moving forward on a second generation of Volts aimed at eliminating the initial model’s considerable shortcomings. (In truth, the first-generation Volt was as good as written off inside G.M., which decided to cut its 2011 production volume to a mere 10,000 units rather than the initial plan for 60,000.) Yet G.M. seemingly has no plan for turning its low-volume “eco-flagship” into a mass-market icon like the Prius.

Quantifying just how much taxpayer money will have been wasted on the hastily developed Volt is no easy feat. Start with the $50 billion bailout (without which none of this would have been necessary), add $240 million in Energy Department grants doled out to G.M. last summer, $150 million in federal money to the Volt’s Korean battery supplier, up to $1.5 billion in tax breaks for purchasers and other consumer incentives, and some significant portion of the $14 billion loan G.M. got in 2008 for “retooling” its plants, and you’ve got some idea of how much taxpayer cash is built into every Volt.
Yep, electric cars are a way to create jobs: for Federal bureaucrats. If that money had been left in private hands, and only 10% of it went to new car purchases, it would have created more jobs for autoworkers than is the case. Not to mention all the other industries that could have benefited.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

This newspaper quote is a sham. There was a group who was in need of help and it was up to the responsible to help the unfortunate little company and it's personnel. Well done, I say!

Signed,
Wesley Mouch

Hershblogger said...

Welcome Wesley.

When do you take delivery on your new Volt?

Or are you one of the little people who will need a bigger subsidy in order to buy one?

Anonymous said...

Bigger subsidy - good idea. ;)

WM